摘要Hydrodynamic pressure is the major cause of vehicle hydroplaning in wet weather. By establishing a finite element model of the tire with longitudinal and transverse pattern, hydrodynamic pressure of the tire under different driving conditions and distributing pattern of water velocity in different parts of the tire were obtained through Fluent. The relations of hydrodynamic pressure with vehicle velocity, water film thickness, and tire pattern depth were gained based on data regression. The results show that (1) hydrodynamic pressure of the tire depends on water film thickness, tread pattern depth, and vehicle speed; (2) as water film thickness increases, the relation between hydrodynamic pressure and vehicle speed gradually shifts from non-linear to linear; and (3) influence of vehicle speed on hydrodynamic pressure is the most obvious, and changing the tread pattern depth alone cannot completely avoid hydroplaning.
Abstract:Hydrodynamic pressure is the major cause of vehicle hydroplaning in wet weather. By establishing a finite element model of the tire with longitudinal and transverse pattern, hydrodynamic pressure of the tire under different driving conditions and distributing pattern of water velocity in different parts of the tire were obtained through Fluent. The relations of hydrodynamic pressure with vehicle velocity, water film thickness, and tire pattern depth were gained based on data regression. The results show that (1) hydrodynamic pressure of the tire depends on water film thickness, tread pattern depth, and vehicle speed; (2) as water film thickness increases, the relation between hydrodynamic pressure and vehicle speed gradually shifts from non-linear to linear; and (3) influence of vehicle speed on hydrodynamic pressure is the most obvious, and changing the tread pattern depth alone cannot completely avoid hydroplaning.
董斌, 张亮, 陈明磊, 唐伯明, 刘唐志. 基于FLUENT软件的雨天轮胎动水压强影响因素研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 7(1): 98-104.
DONG Bin, ZHANG Liang, CHEN Ming-lei, TANG Bo-ming, LIU Tang-zhi. Influencing Factor of Hydrodynamic Pressure on Tire in Wet Weather Based on Fluent. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 7(1): 98-104.
[1] HORNE W B,LELAND T J W. Influence of Tire Tread Pattern and Runway Surface Condition on Braking Friction and Rolling Resistance of a Modern Aircraft Tire[M].Washington,DC:NASA,1962.
[2] PELLOLI R. Road Surface Characteristics and Hydroplaning[J].Transportation Research Record,1976,624:27-32.
[3] FWA T F,KUMARS S,ONG G P,et al.Study of Effect of Rib Tire on Hydroplaning by Analytical Modeling[C]//TRB 2008 Annual Meeting.Washington D.C.:TRB,2008:109-118.
[4] JI Tianjian.Effect of Rainfall on Adhesion Coefficient of Tire-pavement Interface[D].Nanjing:Southeast University,2004.(in Chinese)
[5] JI Tianjian,HUANG Xiaoming,LIU Qingquan.Part Hydroplaning Effect on Pavement Friction Coefficient[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2003,3(4):10-12.(in Chinese)
[6] JI Tianjian,HUANG Xiaoming,LIU Qingquan,et al.Prediction Model of Rain Water Depth on Road Surface[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2004,4(3):1-3.(in Chinese)
[7] JI Tianjian,AN Jingfeng,HE Shenming,et al.Depth Prediction of Rainwater on Road Surface Based on Artificial Neural Network[J].Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics,2006,23(2):115-119.
[8] LUAN Xifu,ZHOU Jun. ADAMS Simulation on the Phenomenon of Water Slippery[J].Journal of Jiamusi University:Natural Science Edition,2006,24(3):388-389.(in Chinese)
[9] ZHUANG Jide.Automotive Tires Theory[M]. Beijing:Beijing Institute of Technology Press,1999.(in Chinese)
[10] JANAJREH I,REZGUI A,ESTENNE V. Tire Tread Pattern Analysis for Ultimate Performance of Hydroplaning[C]//Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics Proceedings.Kidlington:Elsevier,2001:264-267.
[11] JANAJREH I, REZGUI A, ESTENNE V. Towards Free Surface Hydroplaning over a Loaded Tire[C]//Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics Proceedings.Kidlington:Elsevier,2001:1250-1253.
[12] DONG Bin.Research on Partly Hydroplaning of Safety Drive in Expressway[D].Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University,2011. (in Chinese)
[1]
李高盛, 彭玲, 李祥, 吴同. 基于LSTM的城市公交车站短时客流量预测研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 65-72.
[2]
胡宝雨, 赵琥, 孙祥龙, 王弟鑫, 刘宁. 城市公交与农村客运同步换乘模型研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 73-79.
[3]
郭建科, 邱煜焜, 白家圆, 王利. 基于城市公共交通可达性的医疗服务空间分异及均等化研究——以大连市为例[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 80-89.
[4]
赵妮娜, 赵晓华, 林展州, 葛书芳. 主线分流互通立交指路标志版面形式研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 90-102.
[5]
姜明, 陈艳艳, 冯移冬, 周瑞. 路侧示警桩设置关键指标研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 79-87.
[6]
蔡静, 刘莹, 张明辉. 京津冀货物运输结构调整策略研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 88-93.
[7]
常云涛, 王奕彤. 连续流交叉口信号配时优化模型[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 66-74.
[8]
林丽, 冯辉, 朱泳旭. 基于Ring-Barrier相位的干线公交协调控制[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 85-91.
[9]
胡祖平, 何建佳. 基于网络可靠性的街区开放适宜度研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 51-58.
[10]
陈红, 马晓彤, 赵丹婷. 基于元胞自动机的破损路面车辆换道仿真研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 75-84.
[11]
李新, 毛剑楠, 骆晨, 刘澜. 基于MFD的路网可扩展边界控制方法研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 59-65.
[12]
郝丽, 胡大伟, 李晨. T-JIT环境下企业供应链中采购管理供应商选择和订单分配研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 80-89.
[13]
姚佼, 徐洁琼, 倪屹聆. 城市干道多时段协调控制优化研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 60-70.
[14]
潘兵宏, 余英杰, 武生权, 严考权. 基于UC-win/Road仿真的高速公路出口预告标志前置距离研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 71-79.
[15]
何南, 李季涛. 考虑运输方式间影响关系的公路客运交通需求预测[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 90-96.