1. Institute of Transportation Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Optimal Cycle Model Based on Active Transit Signal Priority Strategies in Artery Coordination Systems
TAN Zhen1, MEI Zhen-yu1, HUANG Zhi-yi1, MA Wan-jing2
1. Institute of Transportation Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
摘要Studies on active transit signal priority (active TSP) focus primarily on the advantages and parameters of priority strategies within a given cycle time, which is not necessarily the optimal cycle. With consideration for the restrictions resulting from arterial coordination, the effect of three active TSP strategies on vehicle delays at a key intersection on an arterial road was discussed. Using an actual case, the effect of possible real volume variations on optimal cycles under active TSP strategies was analyzed. Results show that under special flow conditions, additional benefits exist when the cycle time is increased from the value generated by the TRRL approach. The extent of increase can rise with the ratio of priority phase flow to nonpriority phase flow. Cycle time can be dynamically established in accordance with the flow conditions in actual operations. The findings also show that the efficacy of red truncation is better than that of green extension.
Abstract:Studies on active transit signal priority (active TSP) focus primarily on the advantages and parameters of priority strategies within a given cycle time, which is not necessarily the optimal cycle. With consideration for the restrictions resulting from arterial coordination, the effect of three active TSP strategies on vehicle delays at a key intersection on an arterial road was discussed. Using an actual case, the effect of possible real volume variations on optimal cycles under active TSP strategies was analyzed. Results show that under special flow conditions, additional benefits exist when the cycle time is increased from the value generated by the TRRL approach. The extent of increase can rise with the ratio of priority phase flow to nonpriority phase flow. Cycle time can be dynamically established in accordance with the flow conditions in actual operations. The findings also show that the efficacy of red truncation is better than that of green extension.
基金资助:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.50908205);the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (No.LY12E08020);and the National High-Tech Research and Development Program (863 Program) (No.2011AA110302)
通讯作者:
TAN Zhen, tanzhen_thomas@163.com
E-mail: tanzhen_thomas@163.com
引用本文:
谭真, 梅振宇, 黄志义, 马万经. 协调控制下主动信号优先策略的最佳周期模型[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 7(3): 76-83.
TAN Zhen, MEI Zhen-yu, HUANG Zhi-yi, MA Wan-jing. Optimal Cycle Model Based on Active Transit Signal Priority Strategies in Artery Coordination Systems. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 7(3): 76-83.
[1] XU H, SUN J, ZHENG M. Comparative Analysis of Unconditional and Conditional Priority for Use at Isolated Signalized Intersections[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2010, 136(12):1092-1103.
[2] MA Wan-jing, YANG Xiao-guang. Efficiency Analysis of Transit Signal Priority Strategies on Isolated Intersection[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20(12):3311-3313.(in Chinese)
[3] RAKHA H, ZHANG Y. Sensitivity Analysis of Transit Signal Priority Impacts on Operation of a Signalized Intersection[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2004, 30(6):796-804.
[4] CHADA S, NEWLAND R. Effectiveness of Bus Signal Priority, NCTR-416-04[R]. Tampa:National Center for Transit Research, 2002.
[5] NGNA V, SAYED T, ABDELFATAH A. Impacts of Various Parameters on Transit Signal Priority Effectiveness[J]. Journal of Public Transportation, 2004, 7(3):71-93.
[6] YANG Xiao-guang, LIN Yu, HANG Ming-sheng. Study of Solution for Transit Priority Signal[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2001, 14(S1):101-104. (in Chinese)
[7] VASUDEVAN M, CHANG G. Design Framework for Integrating Real-time Bus Priority Control with Robust Arterial Signal Progression[M]. Washington, D. C.:Transportation Research Board, 2001.
[8] LIU Hong-chao, ZHANG Jie, CHENG Ding-xin. Analytical Approach to Evaluating Transit Signal Priority[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2008, 8(2):48-57. (in Chinese)
[9] FURTH P, MULLER T. Conditional Bus Priority at Signalized Intersections:Better Service with Less Traffic Disruption[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2000, 1731:23-30.
[10] DUERR P. Dynamic Right-of-Way for Transit Vehicles:An Integrated Modeling Approach for Optimizing Signal Control on Mixed Traffic Arterials[M].Washington, D. C.:Transportation Research Board, 2000.
[11] GARROW M, MACHEMEHL R. Development and Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority Strategies, SWUTC/97/472840-00068-1[R]. Austin:Center for Transportation Research,1997.
[12] ZEESHAN R, BRUCE R. Analytical Method for Estimating the Impact of Transit Signal Priority on Vehicle Delay[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2011, 137(8):589-621.
[13] ZHANG Wei-hua, SHI Qin, LIU Qiang. Study of Vehicle Delay Calculation and Optimal Signal-planning Method for Intersections with Induced Signal Based on Bus Priority[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science Technology:Urban Science, 2004, 21(4):30-33. (in Chinese)
[14] ZHANG Meng-meng, JIA Lei, ZOU Nan, et al. Robust Optimal Traffic Signal Timing of Urban Single-point Intersection[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2011, 28(1):107-111. (in Chinese)
[1]
李高盛, 彭玲, 李祥, 吴同. 基于LSTM的城市公交车站短时客流量预测研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 65-72.
[2]
胡宝雨, 赵琥, 孙祥龙, 王弟鑫, 刘宁. 城市公交与农村客运同步换乘模型研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 73-79.
[3]
郭建科, 邱煜焜, 白家圆, 王利. 基于城市公共交通可达性的医疗服务空间分异及均等化研究——以大连市为例[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 80-89.
[4]
赵妮娜, 赵晓华, 林展州, 葛书芳. 主线分流互通立交指路标志版面形式研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 90-102.
[5]
姜明, 陈艳艳, 冯移冬, 周瑞. 路侧示警桩设置关键指标研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 79-87.
[6]
蔡静, 刘莹, 张明辉. 京津冀货物运输结构调整策略研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 88-93.
[7]
常云涛, 王奕彤. 连续流交叉口信号配时优化模型[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 66-74.
[8]
林丽, 冯辉, 朱泳旭. 基于Ring-Barrier相位的干线公交协调控制[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 85-91.
[9]
胡祖平, 何建佳. 基于网络可靠性的街区开放适宜度研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 51-58.
[10]
陈红, 马晓彤, 赵丹婷. 基于元胞自动机的破损路面车辆换道仿真研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 75-84.
[11]
李新, 毛剑楠, 骆晨, 刘澜. 基于MFD的路网可扩展边界控制方法研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 59-65.
[12]
郝丽, 胡大伟, 李晨. T-JIT环境下企业供应链中采购管理供应商选择和订单分配研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 80-89.
[13]
姚佼, 徐洁琼, 倪屹聆. 城市干道多时段协调控制优化研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 60-70.
[14]
潘兵宏, 余英杰, 武生权, 严考权. 基于UC-win/Road仿真的高速公路出口预告标志前置距离研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 71-79.
[15]
何南, 李季涛. 考虑运输方式间影响关系的公路客运交通需求预测[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 90-96.