1. Key Laboratory of Operation Safety Technology on Transport Vehicles, Beijing 100088, China;
2. Automobile School Chang'an University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710064, China
Correlation between Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Steering Performance of Passenger Vehicles
CHEN Juan-juan1, WANG Sheng-chang2, LIU Dan2, CAI Feng-tian1, YANG Ze-zhong1
1. Key Laboratory of Operation Safety Technology on Transport Vehicles, Beijing 100088, China;
2. Automobile School Chang'an University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710064, China
摘要The relationship between subjective and objective evaluations on the steering performance of passenger vehicles is investigated to realize the subjective evaluation with objective measurement and to completely replace the objective measurement by subjective evaluation. The subjective evaluation uses steering performance as the study point, and objective evaluation focuses on angle pulse, wheel, snaking, and central tests. The subjective and objective evaluation systems are established, which consist of 7 subjective evaluation indicators (inherent steering characteristics, steering transient response, yawing response, and others) and 17 objective evaluation indicators (formant frequency, average steering angle, yaw velocity gain, et al.). A total of 7 groups of subjective evaluation score and 17 groups of objective evaluation score are obtained by evaluating 4 vehicles. The functional relationship between subjective and objective evaluations is established through regression analysis. Result shows that a 1D binary linear relationship exists between subjective and objective evaluation indicators under a small sample condition. Most of the subjective evaluation indicators have a negative relationship with formant level within the linear function. The formant level is a critical indicator that influences the steering performance of passenger vehicles on the basis of hypothesis testing and dynamic analysis. The lower the formant level is, the higher the subjective evaluation score will be.
Abstract：The relationship between subjective and objective evaluations on the steering performance of passenger vehicles is investigated to realize the subjective evaluation with objective measurement and to completely replace the objective measurement by subjective evaluation. The subjective evaluation uses steering performance as the study point, and objective evaluation focuses on angle pulse, wheel, snaking, and central tests. The subjective and objective evaluation systems are established, which consist of 7 subjective evaluation indicators (inherent steering characteristics, steering transient response, yawing response, and others) and 17 objective evaluation indicators (formant frequency, average steering angle, yaw velocity gain, et al.). A total of 7 groups of subjective evaluation score and 17 groups of objective evaluation score are obtained by evaluating 4 vehicles. The functional relationship between subjective and objective evaluations is established through regression analysis. Result shows that a 1D binary linear relationship exists between subjective and objective evaluation indicators under a small sample condition. Most of the subjective evaluation indicators have a negative relationship with formant level within the linear function. The formant level is a critical indicator that influences the steering performance of passenger vehicles on the basis of hypothesis testing and dynamic analysis. The lower the formant level is, the higher the subjective evaluation score will be.
基金资助:Supported by Transportation Vehicle Safety Technology, Transportation Industry Key Laboratory Open Project Foundation Project(KFKT2015-07)
通讯作者:
CHEN Juan-juan
E-mail: jj.chen@rioh.cn
引用本文:
陈娟娟, 王生昌, 刘丹, 蔡凤田, 杨泽中. 乘用车转向性能主观评价与客观评价相关性[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 98-102.
CHEN Juan-juan, WANG Sheng-chang, LIU Dan, CAI Feng-tian, YANG Ze-zhong. Correlation between Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Steering Performance of Passenger Vehicles. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 98-102.
[1] CHEN D C, CROLLA D A, ALSTEAD C J, et al. A Comprehensive Study of Subjective and Objective Vehicle Handling Behaviour[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1996, 25(S1):66-86.
[2] ZSCHOCKE A K, ALBERS A. Links between Subjective and Objective Evaluations Regarding the Steering Character of Automobiles[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2008, 9(4):473-481.
[3] LAURENCE P, BASSET M, COUTANT P, et al. Lateral Vehicle Behaviour:Comparison of Subjective/Objective Assessment Using the Choquet Integral[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2010, 34(5):357-379.
[4] CHABRIER E, GRIMA M. Subjective and Objective Vehicle Tests, Two Parallel Vehicle Handling Evaluations[C]//Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 World Automotive Congress. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012:767-1775.
[5] HE Xu-xin, SU Zhi-cheng. Links between Subjective Assessments and Objective Metrics for Steering[D]. Stockholm:Royal Institute of Technology, 2012.
[6] GÓMEZ G L G, NYBACKA M, BAKKER E. Findings from Subjective Evaluations and Driver Ratings of Vehicle Dynamic:Steering and Handling[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2015, 53(10):1416-1438.
[7] ZONG Chang-fu, GUO Kong-hui. Subjective Evaluation for Handling and Stability of Vehicle[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2001, 22(5):289-292.(in Chinese)
[8] BAI Yan. Research of Vehicle Handling Evaluation Method Based on Multiple Linear Regressions[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2007.(in Chinese)
[9] DANG Jian-ming, CHEN Hui, ZHAO Xiang-lei, et al. A Study on the Correlation Between Subjective and Objective Evaluations for On-center Steering Force Characteristics[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2015, 37(8):946-950.(in Chinese)
[10] KONG Fan-sen, GUO Kong-hui, ZONG Chang-fu. Study on Grey Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Motor Vehicle Maneuverability and Stability Based on Genetic Algorithms[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2004, 40(7):119-123.(in Chinese)
[11] ZHAO Zhen-dong, LEI Yu-cheng. A Data Processing of Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Vehicle Handling[J]. Automobile Technology, 2007(5), 21-24.(in Chinese)
[12] SAE J1441-1998, Subjective Rating Scale for Vehicle Handling[S]. America:SAE Vehicle Dynamics Forum Committee, 1998.
[13] TIAN Xiao-xue. Research on Subjective Evaluation Method of Automobile Performance[D]. Xi'an:Chang'an University, 2014.(in Chinese)
[14] BERND H, HANS J B. Subjective Evaluation of Driving Dynamics Performance of Automotive[M]. Beijing:China Communication Press, 2010.(in Chinese)
[15] GB/T 6323-2014, Controllability and Stability Test Procedure for Automobile[S]. (in Chinese)
[16] HE Xiao-qun, LIU Wen-qing. Application of Regression Analysis[M]. Beijing:China Renmin University Press, 2015.(in Chinese)
[17] WANG Chang-qing. Study on Objective Evaluation Index System of On-Center Handling for Passenger Car[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2012.(in Chinese)
[18] LINKE W, RICHTER B, SCHMIDT R. Simulation and Measurement of Driver Vehicle Handling Performance[J]. Warrendale PA:SAE paper 730486.
[1]
李高盛, 彭玲, 李祥, 吴同. 基于LSTM的城市公交车站短时客流量预测研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 65-72.
[2]
阳逸鸣, 彭建新, 张建仁. 服役桥梁构件随机场参数估计及相应方法比较分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 38-49.
[3]
高大威, 郑腾飞. 基于微型客车碰撞的近似模型预测精度研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 94-103.
[4]
唐歌腾, 任春晓, 李臣, 董轩. 基于TruckSim的不同弯道半径安全车速确定方法[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 91-97.
[5]
张缓缓, 向绪爱, 叶克宝. 基于稳定性的四轮驱动电动汽车转矩分配策略研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 98-102.
[6]
杨春风, 高恒楠, 孙吉书, 苗大萍. 基于改进的灰关联度组合赋权法的公路交通安全评价研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(4): 71-77.
[7]
孟凡奇, 钱振东, 杨理广. 基于热物性的陶瓷沥青混凝土阻热性能研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(2): 1-7.
[8]
和豪涛, 李扬, 张正华. 基于AHP-灰色关联度的公路大件运输方案优选[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(2): 98-102.
[9]
贾爱琴, 崔建锋, 陈建军, 高卫. 基于可靠灰色粒子群算法的汽车悬架参数的多目标优化设计[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(3): 102-110.
[10]
肖川, 邱延峻, 曾杰, 李保险. FWD载荷作用下的沥青路面实测动力响应研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 8(4): 1-9.
2018, Vol. 12 
