1. Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China;
2. Highway and Bridge Center of Highway Administration, Guangzhou Guangdong 510075, China
Study on the Relationship between Asset Condition and Safety (Part I)
GAO Jian1, ZHANG Jian-dong2, LUO Mei-cun2
1. Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China;
2. Highway and Bridge Center of Highway Administration, Guangzhou Guangdong 510075, China
摘要Incorporating safety performance measures into asset management can assist agencies in efficiently managing their aging assets and improve system-wide safety. Previous studies have revealed the relationship between individual asset performance and safety; however,the relationship between combined measures of operational asset condition and safety performance has not been explored. Thus, in this paper, the effect of pavement marking retroreflectivity and pavement condition on safety was investigated in a multiobjective manner. Data on one-mile segments for all primary roads from 2004 to 2009 were collected from a state of the U.S. and integrated by GIS tools. An Asset Condition Index (ACI) ranging from 1 to 3 was developed for each road segment by scoring and weighting the individual components. Finally, statistical models were then developed to estimatethe relationship between ACI and expected number of crashes, while controlling for exposure.Future studies will focus on developing a methodology to prioritize safety improvements on the basis of asset conditions.
Abstract:Incorporating safety performance measures into asset management can assist agencies in efficiently managing their aging assets and improve system-wide safety. Previous studies have revealed the relationship between individual asset performance and safety; however,the relationship between combined measures of operational asset condition and safety performance has not been explored. Thus, in this paper, the effect of pavement marking retroreflectivity and pavement condition on safety was investigated in a multiobjective manner. Data on one-mile segments for all primary roads from 2004 to 2009 were collected from a state of the U.S. and integrated by GIS tools. An Asset Condition Index (ACI) ranging from 1 to 3 was developed for each road segment by scoring and weighting the individual components. Finally, statistical models were then developed to estimatethe relationship between ACI and expected number of crashes, while controlling for exposure.Future studies will focus on developing a methodology to prioritize safety improvements on the basis of asset conditions.
基金资助:Supported by the Science and Technology Project Commissioned by Guangdong Highway Administration (NO.2013-19);the Science and Technology Project Commissioned by Ministry of Transport (NO.2012312223340)
高剑, 张建栋, 罗梅村. 公路资产与交通安全的关系研究(I)[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 8(2): 99-104.
GAO Jian, ZHANG Jian-dong, LUO Mei-cun. Study on the Relationship between Asset Condition and Safety (Part I). Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 8(2): 99-104.
[1] CHUN Yip-chan, YANG Bao-shan, YAN Xue-dong, et al.Investigating Effects of Asphalt Pavement Conditions on Traffic Accidents in Tennessee Based on the Pavement Management System (PMS)[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2010, 44, 150-161.
[2] START M R, KIMJ, BERG W D.Potential Safety Cost-Effectiveness of TreatingRutted Pavements[J]. Transportation Research Board, 1998, 1629:208-213.
[3] NAKATSUJI T, KAKU T, FUJIWARA T, et al. Surface Characteristics of Roadways-International Research and Technologies:Dynamic Behavior of a Vehicle on a Rutted Road[R]. Baltimore, MD:American Society for Testing and Materials,1990.
[4] BURNS J C.Roughness and Roadway Safety[J]. Transportation Research Board, 1981, 836:8-14.
[5] CAIRNEY P, BENNETT P.Relationship between Road Surface Characteristic and Crashes on Victorian Rural Roads[M]. Adelaide, Australia:23rd ARRB Conference-Research Partnering with Practitioners, 2008.
[6] CENEK P D, DAVIES R B.Crash Risk Relationships for Improved Safety Management of Roads[R].Wellington, New Zealand:Opus International Consultants and Statistics Research Associates, 2002.
[7] SHAFIZADEH K, MANNERING F, PIERCEL.A Statistical Analysis of Factors Associated with Driver-Perceive Road Roughness on Urban Highways, Publication WA-RD 538.1[R]. Seattle, Washington, D. C.:Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC),2002.
[8] MCGHEE K H. Automated Pavement Distress Collection Techniques,NCHRP SYNTHESIS 334[R]. Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board, 2004.
[9] Transportation Research Division.Bridge Deck Resurfacing Using Asphalt, Interim Report[R]. Augusta, Maine:Maine DOT Transportation Research Division,2006.
[10] HALL J W, SMITH K L, TITUS-GLOVER L, et al. Guide for Pavement Friction, NCHRP Web-Only Document 108[R]. Washington,D.C.:Transportation Research Board, 2009.
[11] HENRY J J. Evaluation of Pavement Friction Characteristics:A Synthesis of Highway Practice,NCHRP SYNTHESIS 291[R]. Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board, 2000.
[12] HARRIGAN E T. Pavement Marking Materials and Markers:Testing the Relationship between Retroreflectivity and Safety,NCHRP Research Results Digest 305[R] Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board,2006.
[13] SMADI O, SOULEYRETTE R R, ORMAND DJ, et al. Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity-Analysis of Safety Effectiveness[J]. Transportation Research Board, 2008,2056:17-24.
[14] ETHEN J L, WOLTMAN H L.Minimum Retroreflectance for Nighttime Visibility of Pavement Markings[J]. Transportation Research Board, 1986, 1092:43-47.
[15] MIGLETS J, GRAHAM J L. Long-Term Pavement Marking Practices,NCHRP Synthesis 306[R]. Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board, 2002.
[16] WASHINGTON S P, KARLAFTIS M G, MANNERING F L. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis[M]. Boca Raton, Florida:Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2003.
[17] BAHAR G, MASLIAH M, ERWIN T, et al. Pavement Marking Materials and Markers:Real-World Relationship between Retroreflectivity and Safety over Time,CHRP Web-Only Document 92[R].Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board, 2006.
[1]
周星宇, 李红梅, 郑伟皓, 唐智慧, 杨丽君. 基于交互式BP-UKF模型的短时交通流预测方法[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 56-64.
[2]
姜明, 陈艳艳, 冯移冬, 周瑞. 路侧示警桩设置关键指标研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 79-87.
[3]
陈树礼, 王建雷, 许宏伟, 底杰, 李志明. 桥下采沙对桥梁受力及安全影响研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(2): 51-58.
[4]
王东柱, 陈艳艳, 马建明, C. Michael WALTON. 车联网环境下的高速公路合流区协调控制方法及效果评价[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(4): 90-97.
[5]
唐自强, 龚贤武, 潘勇, 唐超, 王玮琳. 基于行驶状态估计的车车协同纵向安全距离模型[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(2): 103-110.
[6]
唐歌腾, 任春晓, 李臣, 董轩. 基于TruckSim的不同弯道半径安全车速确定方法[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 91-97.
[7]
戢晓峰, 张玲, 冯川. 多源出行信息影响下的路径选择行为仿真研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 77-83.
[8]
史晓花, 杜志刚, 周立平, 李平凡. 公路隧道中部视错觉减速标线优化研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(4): 63-70.
[9]
杨春风, 高恒楠, 孙吉书, 苗大萍. 基于改进的灰关联度组合赋权法的公路交通安全评价研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(4): 71-77.
[10]
王雁, 穆春阳, 马行. 基于Zernike不变矩与SVM交通标志的识别[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(3): 85-89.
[11]
高剑, 张凡, 孙玲. 公路资产与交通安全的关系研究(II)[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 91-96.
[12]
王书举, 潘一山, 张国胜, 崔海涛. 基于ECE R66法规的客车侧翻碰撞安全性分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 97-101.
[13]
张邻, 黄选伟, 吴伟明. 机非混行驾驶行为博弈分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(3): 85-93.
[14]
张荣辉, 周佳利, 游峰, 周喜, 裴玉龙. 基于分级树状级联分类的双特征夜间行人检测[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(2): 77-83.
[15]
庞明宝, 蔡章辉, 杨敏, 张莎莎. 高速公路协调控制信号施加策略[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(1): 79-87.