摘要This second part of the study is a follow-up to Part I. In addition to the Asset Condition Index (ACI) establishments and statistical model estimates of the first part, this further study analyzed several typical asset improvement methods, which placed priority on safety. This study used data that were identical to those in the previous one study, i.e., the one-mile-segment data set for all state primary roads from 2004 to 2009 integrated using geographic information system (GIS) tools. With the estimated ACI and the separate models, this study focused on developing a methodology to prioritize safety improvements based on asset conditions. Results indicate that minor rehabilitation and durable material marking have the highest B/C ratio when a one-year analysis period is considered. To expand the analysis for 5 years, a decision-making matrix of ACI ranges versus treatment alternatives was developed.
Abstract：This second part of the study is a follow-up to Part I. In addition to the Asset Condition Index (ACI) establishments and statistical model estimates of the first part, this further study analyzed several typical asset improvement methods, which placed priority on safety. This study used data that were identical to those in the previous one study, i.e., the one-mile-segment data set for all state primary roads from 2004 to 2009 integrated using geographic information system (GIS) tools. With the estimated ACI and the separate models, this study focused on developing a methodology to prioritize safety improvements based on asset conditions. Results indicate that minor rehabilitation and durable material marking have the highest B/C ratio when a one-year analysis period is considered. To expand the analysis for 5 years, a decision-making matrix of ACI ranges versus treatment alternatives was developed.
高剑, 张凡, 孙玲. 公路资产与交通安全的关系研究(II)[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 91-96.
GAO Jian, ZHANG Fan, SUN Ling. A Study on the Relationship between Asset Condition and Safety (Part Ⅱ). Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 91-96.
[1] GAO Jian, LUO Mei-cun, ZHANG Jian-dong. A Study on the Relationship between Asset Condition and Safety (Part I)[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 8(2):99-104. (in Chinese)
[2] WASHINGTON S P, KARLAFTIS M G, MANNERING F L. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis[M]. Boca Raton, Florida:Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2003.
[3] HAINING R P. Spatial Data Analysis:Theory and Practice[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[4] BAILEY T C, GATRELL A C. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis[M]. London:Longman Scientific & Technical, 1995.
[5] BIVAND R S, PEBESMA E J, GOMEZ-RUBIO V. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R[M]. Baltimore, MD:Springer, 2008.
[6] CRESSIE N. Statistics for Spatial Data[M]. New York:Wiley Interscience, 1993.
[7] CHILES J P, DELFINER P. Geostatististics-modelling Spatial Uncertainty[M]. New York:Wiley-interscience, 1999.
[8] SCHABENBERGER O, GOTWAY C A. Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis[M]. Boca Raton, Florida:Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2009
[9] WACKERNAGEL H. Multivariate Geostatistics[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2003.
[10] MASS Highway. Project Development & Design Guide[M]. Boston, MA:Mass DOT, 2006.
[11] HALL J W, SMITH K L, TITUS-GLOVER L, et al. Guide for Pavement Friction, NCHRP Web-Only Document 108[R]. Washington D. C.:Transportation Research Board, 2009.
[12] BAHAR G, MASLIAH M, ERWIN T, et al. Pavement Marking Materials and Markers:Real-World Relationship between Retroreflectivity and Safety over Time. NCHRP Web-Only Document 92[R]. Washington D. C.:Transportation Research Board, 2006.
[13] THOMAS G B, SCHLOZ C. Durable, Cost-Effective Pavement Markings Phase I:Synthesis of Current Research[R]. Iowa DOT Project TR-454. Ames, Iowa:Iowa Department of Transportation, 2001.
[1]
周星宇, 李红梅, 郑伟皓, 唐智慧, 杨丽君. 基于交互式BP-UKF模型的短时交通流预测方法[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 56-64.
[2]
姜明, 陈艳艳, 冯移冬, 周瑞. 路侧示警桩设置关键指标研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 79-87.
[3]
陈树礼, 王建雷, 许宏伟, 底杰, 李志明. 桥下采沙对桥梁受力及安全影响研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(2): 51-58.
[4]
王东柱, 陈艳艳, 马建明, C. Michael WALTON. 车联网环境下的高速公路合流区协调控制方法及效果评价[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(4): 90-97.
[5]
唐自强, 龚贤武, 潘勇, 唐超, 王玮琳. 基于行驶状态估计的车车协同纵向安全距离模型[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(2): 103-110.
[6]
唐歌腾, 任春晓, 李臣, 董轩. 基于TruckSim的不同弯道半径安全车速确定方法[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 91-97.
[7]
戢晓峰, 张玲, 冯川. 多源出行信息影响下的路径选择行为仿真研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 77-83.
[8]
史晓花, 杜志刚, 周立平, 李平凡. 公路隧道中部视错觉减速标线优化研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(4): 63-70.
[9]
杨春风, 高恒楠, 孙吉书, 苗大萍. 基于改进的灰关联度组合赋权法的公路交通安全评价研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(4): 71-77.
[10]
王雁, 穆春阳, 马行. 基于Zernike不变矩与SVM交通标志的识别[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 10(3): 85-89.
[11]
王书举, 潘一山, 张国胜, 崔海涛. 基于ECE R66法规的客车侧翻碰撞安全性分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(4): 97-101.
[12]
张邻, 黄选伟, 吴伟明. 机非混行驾驶行为博弈分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(3): 85-93.
[13]
张荣辉, 周佳利, 游峰, 周喜, 裴玉龙. 基于分级树状级联分类的双特征夜间行人检测[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(2): 77-83.
[14]
庞明宝, 蔡章辉, 杨敏, 张莎莎. 高速公路协调控制信号施加策略[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(1): 79-87.
[15]
高连生, 易诞, 毛娜. 带台阶的多级边坡稳定性上限分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 8(4): 27-36.
2015, Vol. 9 
