摘要Multi-factor evaluation was established based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to analyze the advantages of different road alignment fitting methods and provide guidance on selecting linear fitting methods for road reconstruction and extension engineering. Through this evaluation system, the reliability, precision, and difficulty degree of the least squares, MATLAB, and cubic spline curve methods were evaluated. Results show that the least squares method exhibits the highest precision; the MATLAB method achieves the strongest stability; and in terms of difficulty degree, the cubic spline curve method is the simplest method. AHP is adopted to calculate the scores of the three methods. The least squares method has the highest score. The score of the MATLAB method is 61.05% that of the least squares method, whereas that of the cubic spline curve method is only 42.72% that of the least squares method. The results quantify the evaluation factors and provide suggestions for selecting an appropriate and effective road fitting method under different conditions. The results also provide a reference for evaluating road alignment methods.
Abstract：Multi-factor evaluation was established based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to analyze the advantages of different road alignment fitting methods and provide guidance on selecting linear fitting methods for road reconstruction and extension engineering. Through this evaluation system, the reliability, precision, and difficulty degree of the least squares, MATLAB, and cubic spline curve methods were evaluated. Results show that the least squares method exhibits the highest precision; the MATLAB method achieves the strongest stability; and in terms of difficulty degree, the cubic spline curve method is the simplest method. AHP is adopted to calculate the scores of the three methods. The least squares method has the highest score. The score of the MATLAB method is 61.05% that of the least squares method, whereas that of the cubic spline curve method is only 42.72% that of the least squares method. The results quantify the evaluation factors and provide suggestions for selecting an appropriate and effective road fitting method under different conditions. The results also provide a reference for evaluating road alignment methods.
基金资助:Supported by the Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project (2016M590915); the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi(S2017-ZRJJ-MS-0603); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(310821172002); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(310821172201)
通讯作者:
ZHANG Chi
E-mail: zhangchi@chd.edu.cn
引用本文:
张驰, 马雄鹰, 王世伟, 宫权利. 基于多因素的道路线形拟合方法综合评价[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(3): 16-23.
ZHANG Chi, MA Xiong-ying, WANG Shi-wei, GONG Quan-li. Road Alignment Fitting Method Evaluation Based on Multi-factor Method. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(3): 16-23.
[1] DRAKOPOULOS A,ÖRNEK E. Use of Vehicle-collected Data to Calculate Existing Roadway Geometry[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering,2000,126(2):154-160.
[2] EASA S M,DONG Hai-bin,LI J. Use of Satellite Imagery for Establishing Road Horizontal Alignments[J]. Journal of Surveying Engineering,2007,133(1):29-35.
[3] LI Zhi-xia, MADHAV V. Automated Identification and Extraction of Horizontal Curve Information from Geographic Information System Roadway Maps[J].Transportation Research Record, 2012, 2291:80-91.
[4] AI Cheng-bo, TSAI Yi-chang. Automatic Horizontal Curve Identification and Measurement Method Using GPS Data[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering,2015,141(2):1-9.
[5] YANG Zhen,FANG Shou-en,GAO Guo-wu. Alignment Parameters Recovery Technique Based on GPS[J].Journal of Tongji University,2003(5):567-571. (in Chinese)
[6] YANG Zhen, ZHU Zhao-hong. Study on Road Alignment Recovery by Vehicle with GPS[J]. Transportation Science of Shandong,2003,30(4):67-69. (in Chinese)
[7] DING Jia-jun,WANG Hong. Existing Highway Horizontal Alignment Recovery Technique Based on MATLAB and CAD Platform[J].IEEE,2011:4977-4980.
[8] ZHANG Hang,HUANG Yun. Analysis of Fitting Method on Plan Curve Based on Cubic Spline[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology,2007,31(5):926-927. (in Chinese)
[9] ZHANG Zhi-wei, LIU Zhi-gang, HUANG Xiao-ming,et al. Research on Fitting Method of Road Horizontal Alignment Based on LIDAR Data[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2009,26(12):17-22. (in Chinese)
[10] KASA I. A Circle Fitting Procedure and Its Error Analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,1976,25(1):8-14.
[11] LIU Su, WANG Wen-qiang, ZHA Xu-dong,et al. Estimate Method for Precision of Fitting Plane Linear in Old Highway Based on Normal Error[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2007,20(5):36-40. (in Chinese)
[12] CHANG Jian-e, JIANG Tai-li. Research on the Weight of Coefficient through Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology,2007,29(1):153-156. (in Chinese)
[13] WANG Yun. Study on the Safety Evaluation System and Method of Urban Traffic Tunnel[D].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2003. (in Chinese)
[1]
李宁, 马骉, 李瑞, 司伟. 基于PUMA的单级和多级加载模式下级配碎石性能研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 1-12.
[2]
许海亮, 任合欢, 何兆才, 何炼. 车路耦合条件下沥青混凝土路面变形特性时域分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 13-19.
[3]
杜健欢, 艾长发, 黄超, 郭玉金, 蒋运兵. 界面水对沥青复合小梁疲劳性能的影响试验[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 1-7.
[4]
姚国强, 言志信, 龙哲, 翟聚云. 基于岩质边坡相似材料的锚固界面剪应力分布规律研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 8-15.
[5]
刘泽, 何矾, 黄天棋, 蒋梅东. 车辆荷载在挡土墙上引起的附加土压力研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 16-23.
[6]
谢全敏, 殷建强, 杨文东. 基于AHP和GC-TOPSIS的山区桥型方案比选研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 60-67.
[7]
邱欣, 徐静娴, 陶钰强, 杨青. 路面结冰条件判别标准及SVM预测分析研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 1-9.
[8]
高伟, 崔巍, 李秀凤. 半刚性基层表面抗冲刷性能试验与分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 10-17.
[9]
张向东, 任昆. 煤渣改良土路基的动弹性模量及临界动应力试验研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 25-32.
[10]
刘栋, 尚小亮, 杨西海. 垃圾焚烧炉渣中可溶盐对水泥稳定材料性能的影响[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 18-24.
[11]
李龙海, 杨茹. 多次加铺的复合道面疲劳寿命分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 7-15.
[12]
蔡旭, 李翔, 吴旷怀, 黄文柯. 基于旋转压实的水泥稳定再生集料设计方法研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 1-6.
[13]
李金路, 冯子强, 吴佳杰, 魏姗姗, 葛智. 环境及疲劳荷载作用下碳纳米管水泥基复合材料压敏性能研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 16-21.
[14]
田小革, 韩海峰, 李新伟, 吴栋, 魏东. 半刚性路面中双层半刚性基层的倒装效应[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 22-27.
[15]
邢磊, 雷柏龄, 陈忠达, 戴学臻. 彩色沥青路面胶凝材料的制备技术[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(2): 1-6.
2017, Vol. 11 
