摘要To study the real dynamic response regularity of asphalt pavement structure under dynamic load, a road test was conducted for three types of typical asphalt pavement. Dynamic and static deflection basins were established.The characteristics of the dynamic deflection basin were studied.The set-in dynamic strain sensors at the bottom of the surface layer collected the dynamic strain response under falling weight deflectometer (FWD) load. Results show that the static deflection basin is deeper than the dynamic deflection basin, but the range of the latter is larger than that of the former.The characteristics of the two deflection basins differ.The change trends of dynamic response with an increase in FWD load reflect nonlinear characteristics.The dynamic strain of three typical asphalt pavements at the bottom of the surface layer does not induce fatigue failure in the pavement structure.The longitudinal strain is larger than the lateral strain.Different prediction models on dynamic strain on the basis of dynamic deflection basin parameters are established.
Abstract：To study the real dynamic response regularity of asphalt pavement structure under dynamic load, a road test was conducted for three types of typical asphalt pavement. Dynamic and static deflection basins were established.The characteristics of the dynamic deflection basin were studied.The set-in dynamic strain sensors at the bottom of the surface layer collected the dynamic strain response under falling weight deflectometer (FWD) load. Results show that the static deflection basin is deeper than the dynamic deflection basin, but the range of the latter is larger than that of the former.The characteristics of the two deflection basins differ.The change trends of dynamic response with an increase in FWD load reflect nonlinear characteristics.The dynamic strain of three typical asphalt pavements at the bottom of the surface layer does not induce fatigue failure in the pavement structure.The longitudinal strain is larger than the lateral strain.Different prediction models on dynamic strain on the basis of dynamic deflection basin parameters are established.
基金资助:Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.SWJTU12ZT05);the Science and Technology Project of Transportation Department of Sichuan Province (No.2010B28-2)
肖川, 邱延峻, 曾杰, 李保险. FWD载荷作用下的沥青路面实测动力响应研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 8(4): 1-9.
XIAO Chuan, QIU Yan-jun, ZENG Jie, LI Bao-xian. Measured Dynamic Response of Asphalt Pavement under FWD Load. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 8(4): 1-9.
[1] YAO Zu-kang. Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[2] QIAN Zhen-dong, ZHANG Lei, CHEN Lei-lei. Pavement Structural Dynamics[M]. Nanjing:Southeast University Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[3] QIU Xing. Study on Modulus Parameter Back Calculation and Correction Method for CTB Asphalt Pavement Based on FWD Testing Technology[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University, 2009.
[4] REN Rui-bo, ZHONG Yang, YIN Jian-hua. The Solution of Road Surface Deflection in the Dynamic Case[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(6):738-740. (in Chinese)
[5] HOU Yun, GUO Zhong-yin, TIAN Bo, et al. Dynamic Deflection Response of Layered Pavement Structure Subjected to Dynamic Load[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2002, 15(3):6-10. (in Chinese)
[6] PARK H M, KIM Y R, PARK S W. Assessment of Pavement Layer Condition with Use of Multiload-level Falling Weight Deflectometer Deflections[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2005, 1905:107-116.
[7] XU Bing, RANJITHAN S R, KIM R Y. New Condition Assessment Procedure for Asphalt Pavement Layers, Using Falling Weight Deflectometer Deflections[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2002, 1806:57-69.
[8] AL-QADI I L, LOULIZI A, ELSEIFI M, et al. The Virginia Smart Road:the Impact of Pavement Instrumentation on Understanding Pavement Performance[J]. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2004, 73:427-465.
[9] PRIEST A L, TIMM D H. A Full Scale Pavement Structural Study for Mechanistic empirical Pavement Design[J]. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2005, 74:519-556.
[10] DONG Zhong-hong, XU Quan-liang, LÜ Peng-min. Dynamic Response of Semi-rigid Base Asphalt Pavement Basedon Accelerated Pavement Test[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24(2):1-5. (in Chinese)
[11] LÜ Peng-min, DONG Zhong-hong. Mechanical Analysis of Vehicle-Asphalt Pavement System[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[12] BENEDETTO D H, ROCHE C D L, BAAJ H, et al. Fatigue of Bituminous Mixtures[J]. Materials and Structures, 2004, 37(3):202-216.
[13] ZHANG Zhi-xiang, CHEN Rong-sheng, BAI Qi-feng. Laboratory Study of Fatigue Limit of LSM Base Mixtures[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2006, 23(4):19-22. (in Chinese)
[14] PING Shu-jiang, SHEN Ai-qin, LI Peng. Study of Fatigue Limit of Asphalt Mixture for Perpetual Pavement[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009, 22(1):34-38. (in Chinese)
[15] WANG Xu-dong, SHA Ai-min, XU Zhi-hong. The Dynamic Characteristics and Dynamic Parameters of Asphalt Pavement Materials[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press, 2002. (in Chinese)
[16] LUO Qi-tian, QIU Xin, YANG Qing. Evaluation Study on Subgrade Modulus Based on FWD Dynamic Deflection Basin Parameters[J]. Highway Engineering, 2011, 36(2):4-8. (in Chinese)
[17] ZHANG Qi-shan, GUO Xi-jiang, DENG Ju-long. Grey Relation Entropy Method of Grey Relation Analysis[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 1996(8):7-11. (in Chinese)
[18] LIU Hong-ying. Grey Relation Entropy Method to Analyze Moisture Stability of Asphalt Concrete[J]. Journal of Chang'an University:Natural Science Edition, 2003, 23(6):7-10. (in Chinese)
[19] GUAN Yu. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis[M]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[1]
李宁, 马骉, 李瑞, 司伟. 基于PUMA的单级和多级加载模式下级配碎石性能研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 1-12.
[2]
许海亮, 任合欢, 何兆才, 何炼. 车路耦合条件下沥青混凝土路面变形特性时域分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 13-19.
[3]
杜健欢, 艾长发, 黄超, 郭玉金, 蒋运兵. 界面水对沥青复合小梁疲劳性能的影响试验[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 1-7.
[4]
姚国强, 言志信, 龙哲, 翟聚云. 基于岩质边坡相似材料的锚固界面剪应力分布规律研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 8-15.
[5]
刘泽, 何矾, 黄天棋, 蒋梅东. 车辆荷载在挡土墙上引起的附加土压力研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 16-23.
[6]
邱欣, 徐静娴, 陶钰强, 杨青. 路面结冰条件判别标准及SVM预测分析研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 1-9.
[7]
高伟, 崔巍, 李秀凤. 半刚性基层表面抗冲刷性能试验与分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 10-17.
[8]
张向东, 任昆. 煤渣改良土路基的动弹性模量及临界动应力试验研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 25-32.
[9]
刘栋, 尚小亮, 杨西海. 垃圾焚烧炉渣中可溶盐对水泥稳定材料性能的影响[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 18-24.
[10]
李龙海, 杨茹. 多次加铺的复合道面疲劳寿命分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 7-15.
[11]
蔡旭, 李翔, 吴旷怀, 黄文柯. 基于旋转压实的水泥稳定再生集料设计方法研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 1-6.
[12]
李金路, 冯子强, 吴佳杰, 魏姗姗, 葛智. 环境及疲劳荷载作用下碳纳米管水泥基复合材料压敏性能研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 16-21.
[13]
田小革, 韩海峰, 李新伟, 吴栋, 魏东. 半刚性路面中双层半刚性基层的倒装效应[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 22-27.
[14]
李永辉, 朱翔, 陈陆杰, 周同和. 基于试桩实测规律的大直径灌注桩荷载传递计算与分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 28-36.
[15]
邢磊, 雷柏龄, 陈忠达, 戴学臻. 彩色沥青路面胶凝材料的制备技术[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(2): 1-6.
2014, Vol. 8 
