|
|
|
| Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer-to-steel Interfacial Stress Parameter Sensitivity Based on Viscoelastic Constitutive |
| XU Bai-shun1, YAO Chao-yi2, YAO Ya-dong1, QIAN Yong-jiu3, MA Ming4 |
1. Transportation Institute, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot Inner Mongolia 010070, China;
2. CCCC Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, China;
4. CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Xi'an Shaanxi 710075, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The viscoelastic constitutive relation for adhesives is described using the modified Maxwell model to study the influences of the viscoelastic constitutive relation of adhesives and of the design parameters of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)-strengthened steel beam on CFRP-to-steel interfacial stresses. In view of the fact that the adhesive layer of reinforced beam is mainly shear deformation, the analysis of the viscoelastic constitutive of the adhesive is simplified. The solution to the variables of the modified Maxwell model is given using Laplace transform and inverse Laplace transform. Finite element analysis of a typical simply supported steel beam strengthened by CFRP is conducted using ABAQUS. The variation rule of the interface stress with loading time is analyzed. The effects of CFRP elastic modulus, CFRP thickness, adhesive layer thickness, and distance between the CFRP end and the support on the CFRP-to-steel interfacial stress are discussed in detail. On the basis of the fundamental principle of the sensitivity analysis, the degree of sensitivity of the interfacial stress to the different parameters is investigated through quantitative analysis. Results show that (1) the viscoelasticity of the adhesive causes stress redistribution on the bonding interface, and the peak shear stress and peak normal stress of the interface decrease with time; (2) the thicker the adhesive layer, the thinner the CFRP, and the less the elastic modulus of the CFRP; (3) the closer the CFRP to the bearing, the less the interfacial stress; (4) the parameter that exerts the most influence on the interfacial shear stress at the edge of the CFRP is the distance from the edge of the CFRP to the bearing, with a sensitivity factor of 1.359; and (5) the parameter that exerts the most influence on the interfacial normal stress at the edge of the CFRP is the thickness of the polymer, with a sensitivity factor of 0.956.
|
|
Received: 28 March 2018
|
| Fund:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51778532) |
|
Corresponding Authors:
XU Bai-shun
E-mail: xu_baishun@sina.com
|
|
|
|
[1] PENG Hui,ZHANG Jian-ren,CHEN Jun-min,et al. Experimental Study of Bond Performance of Interface between Near-surface-mounted CFRP Strips and Concrete[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2014,31(6):70-79,148.(in Chinese)
[2] LU Nai-wei,LIU Yang,PENG Hui. Analysis on Reliability of RC Girder Bridge Strengthened with Pre-stressed CFRP Plates[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2014,31(12):58-66. (in Chinese)
[3] PENG Fu-ming. Research on the Interfacial Performance of Metallic Structures Strengthened with Fibre Reinforced Polymers[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology,2005. (in Chinese)
[4] DENG Jun,HUANG Pei-yan. Theoretical and Experimental Study on Interfacial Stresses of Steel Beam Strengthened with CFRP Plates[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology:Natural Science Edition,2007,35(7):10-14. (in Chinese)
[5] NARAYANAMURTHY V,CHEN J F,CAIRNS J. Improved Model for Interfacial Stresses Accounting for the Effect of Shear Deformation in Plated Beams[J].International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives,2016,64:33-47.
[6] HAMED E, CHANG Z T. Effect of Creep on the Edge Debonding Failure of FRP Strengthened RC Beams-A Theoretical and Experimental Study[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2013, 74:186-193.
[7] MANCUSI G, SPADEA S, BERARDI V P. Experimental Analysis on the Time-dependent Bonding of FRP Laminates under Sustained Loads[J]. Composites:Part B, 2013, 46(2):116-122.
[8] HOUHOU N, BENZARTI K, QUIERTANT M. Analysis of the Nonlinear Creep Behavior of Concrete/FRP-bonded Assemblies[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2014, 28(14/15):1345-1366.
[9] MAJDA P, SKTODZEWICZ J. A Modified Creep Model of Epoxy Adhesive at Ambient Temperature[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29(4):396-404.
[10] COSTA I, BANOS J. Tensile Creep of a Structural Epoxy Adhesive:Experimental and Analytical Characterization[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2015, 59:115-124.
[11] MESHGIN P, CHOI K, TAHA M. Experimental and Analytical Investigations of Creep of Epoxy Adhesive at the Concrete-FRP Interfaces[J].International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29(1):56-66.
[12] DIAB H, WU Z. A Linear Viscoelastic Model for Interfacial Long-term Behavior of FRP-concrete Interface[J]. Composites Part B, 2008, 39(4):722-730.
[13] FENG Shi-rong,HU Xia-guang,LIU Yu. Numerical Analysis of Viscoelastic Materials Based on Discrete Element Method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2008,25(2):12-15,29. (in Chinese)
[14] MU Xia-ying. Creep Mechanics[M]. Xi'an:Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 1990. (in Chinese)
[15] WANG Xu-cheng. Finite Element Method[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
[16] ZHANG C, WANG J L. Interface Stress Redistribution in FRP-strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beams Using a Three-parameter Viscoelastic Foundation Model[J]. Composites Part B, 2012, 43(8):3009-3019.
[17] JTG/T J22-2008,Specifications for Strengthening Design of Highway Bridges[S]. (in Chinese)
[18] JIANG Shu, WEN Bao-ping. Sensitivity Analysis of Mechanical Parameters of Land-slide Slipzone Using Three Methods[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2015,23(6):1153-1159. (in Chinese) |
| [1] |
FU Yu-fang, ZHANG Jin-quan, NIU Di-tao. Calculation Method for Flexural Damage of RC Beams Subjected to Cyclic Loads and Corrosive Actions[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(3): 44-51. |
| [2] |
CHU Xi, ZHOU Zhi-xiang, DENG Guo-jun, DUAN Xin, JIANG Xin. Application of the Euler Motion Amplification Algorithm to Bridge Vibration Analysis[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(3): 52-61. |
| [3] |
CHANG Zhu-gang, WANG Lin-kai, XIA Fei-long. Fluid-structure Interaction Numerical Simulation of Bridge Wind-induced Vibration Based on CV Newmark-β Method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 28-37. |
| [4] |
WEN Cheng, ZHANG Hong-xian. Influence of Material Time-dependent Performance on the Cantilever Construction of PSC Box Girder Bridge[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 38-44. |
| [5] |
LU Guan-ya, WANG Ke-hai, ZHANG Pan-pan. Seismic Design and Evaluation Methods for Small-to-Medium-Span Highway Girder Bridges Based on Machine Learning and Earthquake Damage Experience[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 24-37. |
| [6] |
YANG Yi-ming, PENG Jian-xin, ZHANG Jian-ren. Random Field Parameter Estimation of Service Bridge Component and Comparative Analysis of Estimation Methods[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 38-49. |
|
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 13 
