基于拟动力方法的地震条件下挡土墙主动土压力研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (684 KB) HTML ()
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 To examine the seismic active pressure on retaining walls, the pseudo-dynamic method is adopted in deducing the formulas of seismic active earth pressure. The critical rupture angle is analytically solved on the basis of conventional sliding wedge limit equilibrium theory. The influencing factors considered for the formulas are seismic force, surcharge angle, the internal friction angle and cohesion of the backfill for retaining walls, the friction angle and cohesion between retaining walls and backfill, and the inclination of retaining walls. The effects of these factors on critical failure angle and seismic active earth pressure coefficient are analyzed. Results show that the critical rupture angle is less than that is calculated using the Mononobe-Okabe method, in which the soil amplification factor and cohesion of backfill are disregarded. The critical rupture angle decreases with increasing soil amplification factor. The seismic active earth pressure coefficient increases with rising seismic coefficient, inclination of retaining walls, or surcharge angle; this coefficient decreases with increasing internal friction angle of backfill or soil amplification factor. The seismic active earth pressure coefficient also decreases and then increases as the friction angle between retaining walls and backfill increases.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	阮晓波
	於汝良
	孙树林

关键词 ： road engineering, retaining wall, pseudo-dynamic method, seismic active earth pressure, critical rupture angle

Abstract：To examine the seismic active pressure on retaining walls, the pseudo-dynamic method is adopted in deducing the formulas of seismic active earth pressure. The critical rupture angle is analytically solved on the basis of conventional sliding wedge limit equilibrium theory. The influencing factors considered for the formulas are seismic force, surcharge angle, the internal friction angle and cohesion of the backfill for retaining walls, the friction angle and cohesion between retaining walls and backfill, and the inclination of retaining walls. The effects of these factors on critical failure angle and seismic active earth pressure coefficient are analyzed. Results show that the critical rupture angle is less than that is calculated using the Mononobe-Okabe method, in which the soil amplification factor and cohesion of backfill are disregarded. The critical rupture angle decreases with increasing soil amplification factor. The seismic active earth pressure coefficient increases with rising seismic coefficient, inclination of retaining walls, or surcharge angle; this coefficient decreases with increasing internal friction angle of backfill or soil amplification factor. The seismic active earth pressure coefficient also decreases and then increases as the friction angle between retaining walls and backfill increases.

Key words： road engineering retaining wall pseudo-dynamic method seismic active earth pressure critical rupture angle

收稿日期: 2012-08-24

通讯作者: RUAN Xiao-bo, ruanxiaobo@hhu.edu.cn E-mail: ruanxiaobo@hhu.edu.cn

引用本文:

阮晓波, 於汝良, 孙树林. 基于拟动力方法的地震条件下挡土墙主动土压力研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 7(2): 34-39.
RUAN Xiao-bo, YU Ru-liang, SUN Shu-lin. Analysis of Seismic Active Earth Pressure on Retaining Walls Based on Pseudo-dynamic Method. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 7(2): 34-39.

链接本文:

http://manu27.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_gljtkj_en/CN/ 或 http://manu27.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_gljtkj_en/CN/Y2013/V7/I2/34

[1] LI Zhi-qiang, LI Jin-bei, KONG Ya-ping. A Seismic Dynamic Reliability of Highway Soil Retaining Structure Based on Seismic Response Analysis[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2011, 28(12):32-38.(in Chinese)
[2] KRAMER S L. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering[M]. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1996.
[3] DAS B M, PURI V K. Static and Dynamic Active Earth Pressure[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1996, 14(4):353-366.
[4] STEEDMAN R S, ZENG X. The Influence of Phase on the Calculation of Pseudo-static Earth Pressure on A Retaining Wall[J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(1):103-112.
[5] CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S. Seismic Passive Resistance by Pseudo-dynamic Method[J]. Géotechnique, 2005, 55(9):699-702.
[6] CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S. Pseudo-dynamic Approach of Seismic Active Earth Pressure Behind Retaining Wall[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(6):1103-1113.
[7] GHOSH S. Pseudo-dynamic Active Force and Pressure behind Battered Retaining Wall Supporting Inclined Backfill[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11):1226-1232.
[8] XIA Tang-dai, HUA Wei-nan, WANG Zhi-kai. Analysis of Seismic Active Earth Pressure of Cohesive Soil behind Inclined Retaining Wall[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 26(S1):315-321. (in Chinese)
[9] CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S. Seismic Rotational Displacement of Gravity Walls by Pseudo-dynamic Method:Passive Case[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(3):242-249.
[10] NIMBALKAR S, CHOUDHURY D. Sliding Stability and Seismic Design of Retaining Wall by Pseudo-dynamic Method for Passive Case[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(6):497-505.
[11] GHOSH P. Seismic Active Earth Pressure behind A Nonvertical Retaining Wall Using Pseudo-dynamic Analysis[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45:117-123.
[12] WANG Li-yan, LIU Han-long. Study of Seismic Active Earth Pressure Acted on Gravity Wall in Backfill Sand[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009, 22(6):26-33. (in Chinese)
[13] KOLATHAYAR S, GHOSH P. Seismic Active Earth Pressure on Walls with Bilinear Backface Using Pseudo-dynamic Approach[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(7):1229-1236.
[14] DAS B M. Principles of Soil Dynamics[M]. Boston, Massachusetts:PWS-KENT Publishing Company, 1993.