摘要The dynamic responses of different slope types are analyzed using the shaking table model test to study the influences of slope position and ground motion parameters on the dynamic response of acceleration. The influences of slope shape, elevation, seismic wave type, vibration intensity, and earthquake frequency on dynamic response are determined. The following conclusions are drawn from the experimental results. (1) The modal parameters of a slope are independent of elevation. The first-order natural frequency of the model system decreases gradually, whereas the damping ratio increases gradually as white noise increases slowly. (2) The acceleration amplification factor of a measuring point on a concave slope is slightly larger than that on a convex slope. The stability of a convex slope is better than that of a concave slope. (3) The elevation amplification effect, which is influenced by slope topography and ground motion parameters, differs under varying seismic loads. The elevation amplification effect of a concave slope is more significant than that of a convex slope. (4) The acceleration amplification coefficient obtained from each measuring point on the slope surface and in the inner region of the slope exhibits an increasing fold line trend. However, the acceleration amplification coefficient of each measuring point on the slope surface is greater than that in the inner region of the slope. (5) The slope dynamic amplification effect is closely related to the natural frequency of a slope. Within a certain range, when the frequency is high, the amplification effect is significant. (6) The influence of vibration strength on the slope dynamic response distribution is minimal along the height direction, whereas the influence on the slope acceleration amplification effect is evident.
Abstract:The dynamic responses of different slope types are analyzed using the shaking table model test to study the influences of slope position and ground motion parameters on the dynamic response of acceleration. The influences of slope shape, elevation, seismic wave type, vibration intensity, and earthquake frequency on dynamic response are determined. The following conclusions are drawn from the experimental results. (1) The modal parameters of a slope are independent of elevation. The first-order natural frequency of the model system decreases gradually, whereas the damping ratio increases gradually as white noise increases slowly. (2) The acceleration amplification factor of a measuring point on a concave slope is slightly larger than that on a convex slope. The stability of a convex slope is better than that of a concave slope. (3) The elevation amplification effect, which is influenced by slope topography and ground motion parameters, differs under varying seismic loads. The elevation amplification effect of a concave slope is more significant than that of a convex slope. (4) The acceleration amplification coefficient obtained from each measuring point on the slope surface and in the inner region of the slope exhibits an increasing fold line trend. However, the acceleration amplification coefficient of each measuring point on the slope surface is greater than that in the inner region of the slope. (5) The slope dynamic amplification effect is closely related to the natural frequency of a slope. Within a certain range, when the frequency is high, the amplification effect is significant. (6) The influence of vibration strength on the slope dynamic response distribution is minimal along the height direction, whereas the influence on the slope acceleration amplification effect is evident.
周志军, 范亚伦, 闫坤伐. 边坡地震动力响应的振动台模型试验[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 23-32.
ZHOU Zhi-jun, FAN Ya-lun, YAN Kun-fa. Shaking Table Model Test of Slope Seismic Dynamic Response. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 11(1): 23-32.
[1] ZHANG Li, FU Hong-yuan, FU Kang-lin, et al. Analysis on Influencing Factors of Slope Dynamic Stability Induced by Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2011,28(4):12-18.(in Chinese)
[2] BOUCKOUALAS G D, PAPADIMITRIOU A G. Numerical Evaluation of Slope Topography Effects on Seismic Ground Motion[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 25(7):547-548.
[3] ZHANG C H, PEKAU O A, JIN F, et al. Application of Distinct Element Method in Dynamic Analysis of High Rock Slope and Blocky Structures[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,1997,16(4):385-394.
[4] KIM D, PAN X, PARADALOS P M. An Enhanced Dynamic Slope Scaling Procedure with Tabu Scheme for Fixed Charge Network Flow Problems[J]. Computational Economics, 2006,6(3):273-293.
[5] XU Guang-xing, YAO Ling-kan, GAO Zhao-ning, et al. Large-scale Shaking Table Model Test Study on Dynamic Characteristics and Dynamic Responses of Slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(3):624-632.(in Chinese)
[6] XU Guang-xing, YAO Ling-kan, LI Zhao-hong, et al. Dynamic Response of Slopes under Earthquakes and Influence of Ground Motion Parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(6):918-923.(in Chinese)
[7] XU Guang-xing. Research on Dynamic Responses and Permanent Displacement of Slope under Earthquake[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010.(in Chinese)
[8] LIN Mei-ling, WANG Kuo-lung. Seismic Slope Behavior in a Large-scale Shaking Table Model Test[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 86(2):118-133.
[9] XU Qiang, CHEN Jian-jun, FENG Wen-kai,et al. Experimental Study of the Seismic Response of Slopes by Physical Modeling[J]. Journal of Sichuan University:Engineering Science Edition, 2009, 41(3):266-272.(in Chinese)[ZK)]
[10] XU Qiang, LIU Han-xiang, ZOU Wei,et al. Large-scale Shaking Table Test Study of Acceleration Dynamic Responses Characteristics of Slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(12):2420-2428.(in Chinese)
[11] FENG Zhi-ren, LIU Hong-shuai, YU Long. Surface Amplification Effect of Bedding Rocky Slope with Weak Interlayer under Earthquake[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2014, 34(1):96-100.(in Chinese)
[12] ZHOU Hong-yan. Research on Seismic Response and Dynamical Stability of Slope[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013.(in Chinese)
[13] YAN Zhi-xin, GAO Le, PENG Ning-bo,et al. Study of Dynamic Response of Bedding Rock Slope under Earthquakes[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(S2):85-90.(in Chinese)
[14] LIU Qiang. Seimic Site Response Analysis and Large-scale Shaking Table Test[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013.(in Chinese)
[15] GB50011-2010, Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S]. (in Chinese)
[16] LI Jin-bei, ZHANG Hong-ru, LI Zhi-qiang. Large-scale Shaking Table Model Test for Fill Subgrade of Highway in High-intensity Earthquake Area[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2011, 28(11):1-6.(in Chinese)
[17] REN Zi-ming. Dynamic Response and Stability of Slope under Seismc Excitations[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007.(in Chinese)
[18] WANG Xi. Study on Deformation Characteristics and Failure Mechanism of Bedding Rock Slope under Earthquake[D].Changchun:Jilin University, 2010.(in Chinese)
[1]
李宁, 马骉, 李瑞, 司伟. 基于PUMA的单级和多级加载模式下级配碎石性能研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 1-12.
[2]
许海亮, 任合欢, 何兆才, 何炼. 车路耦合条件下沥青混凝土路面变形特性时域分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 13-19.
[3]
杜健欢, 艾长发, 黄超, 郭玉金, 蒋运兵. 界面水对沥青复合小梁疲劳性能的影响试验[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 1-7.
[4]
姚国强, 言志信, 龙哲, 翟聚云. 基于岩质边坡相似材料的锚固界面剪应力分布规律研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 8-15.
[5]
刘泽, 何矾, 黄天棋, 蒋梅东. 车辆荷载在挡土墙上引起的附加土压力研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(1): 16-23.
[6]
邱欣, 徐静娴, 陶钰强, 杨青. 路面结冰条件判别标准及SVM预测分析研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 1-9.
[7]
高伟, 崔巍, 李秀凤. 半刚性基层表面抗冲刷性能试验与分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 10-17.
[8]
张向东, 任昆. 煤渣改良土路基的动弹性模量及临界动应力试验研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 25-32.
[9]
刘栋, 尚小亮, 杨西海. 垃圾焚烧炉渣中可溶盐对水泥稳定材料性能的影响[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(4): 18-24.
[10]
李龙海, 杨茹. 多次加铺的复合道面疲劳寿命分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 7-15.
[11]
蔡旭, 李翔, 吴旷怀, 黄文柯. 基于旋转压实的水泥稳定再生集料设计方法研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 1-6.
[12]
李金路, 冯子强, 吴佳杰, 魏姗姗, 葛智. 环境及疲劳荷载作用下碳纳米管水泥基复合材料压敏性能研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 16-21.
[13]
田小革, 韩海峰, 李新伟, 吴栋, 魏东. 半刚性路面中双层半刚性基层的倒装效应[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(3): 22-27.
[14]
邢磊, 雷柏龄, 陈忠达, 戴学臻. 彩色沥青路面胶凝材料的制备技术[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(2): 1-6.
[15]
方薇, 陈向阳, 杨果林. 带齿格栅加筋挡墙工作机理的数值模拟研究[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 12(2): 7-13.