1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, China;
2. China Merchants Chongqing Transport Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400067, China
Probabilistic Analysis of Bridge Collapse during Ship Collisions Based on Reliability Theory
SHAO Jun-hu1, ZHAO Ren-da1, GENG Bo2
1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, China;
2. China Merchants Chongqing Transport Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400067, China
摘要Calculating the collapse probability of large and complex bridges during ship collisions by using reliability theory is an inevitable trend in the development of risk assessment for ship-bridge collisions. On the basis of reliability theory and by combining VC++ with ANSYS general finite element software, we develop a program for computing the reliability of bridges during ship collisions by the ANSYS and response surface method. The collapse probability and reliability sensitivity index of the Jialing River Huanghuayuan Bridge during ship collisions are calculated by the program. Results show the following: (1) the pier collapse probability with ship collisions is greater when the water level of the bridge area is at the normal level of 174 m; (2) the density, ship-collision velocity, ship-collision angle, and concrete compressive strength are the main factors that affect bridge collapse probability during ship collisions.
Abstract:Calculating the collapse probability of large and complex bridges during ship collisions by using reliability theory is an inevitable trend in the development of risk assessment for ship-bridge collisions. On the basis of reliability theory and by combining VC++ with ANSYS general finite element software, we develop a program for computing the reliability of bridges during ship collisions by the ANSYS and response surface method. The collapse probability and reliability sensitivity index of the Jialing River Huanghuayuan Bridge during ship collisions are calculated by the program. Results show the following: (1) the pier collapse probability with ship collisions is greater when the water level of the bridge area is at the normal level of 174 m; (2) the density, ship-collision velocity, ship-collision angle, and concrete compressive strength are the main factors that affect bridge collapse probability during ship collisions.
邵俊虎, 赵人达, 耿波. 基于可靠度的船撞桥梁倒塌概率分析[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(1): 55-62.
SHAO Jun-hu, ZHAO Ren-da, GENG Bo. Probabilistic Analysis of Bridge Collapse during Ship Collisions Based on Reliability Theory. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015, 9(1): 55-62.
[1] AASHTO. Guide Specification and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges[S]. Washington, D. C.:AASHTO, 2009.
[2] DAVIDSON M T,CONSOLAZO G R. Development of an Improved Probability of Collapse Expression for Bridge Piers Subject to Barge Impact[C]//2010 Structures Congress.Orlando:ASCE,2010:3321-3332.
[3] GENG Bo. Safety Assessment of Bridges due to Vessels Impact[D]. Shanghai:Tongji University,2007. (in Chinese)
[4] BAO Long-sheng, LI Liang, YU Ling, et al. The Reliability Analysis of Ship Collision with Thin-walled High Bridge Pier Based on the Finite Element[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Natural Science Edition,2011,27(1):46-51. (in Chinese)
[5] PROSKE D,CURBACH M. Risk to Historical Bridges due to Ship Impact on Risk to Historical Bridges due to Ship Impact on German Inland Waterways[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2005, 90(2/3):261-270.
[6] TB10002.1-2005, Fundamental Code for Design on Railway and Culvert[S].(in Chinese)
[7] LIN Tie-liang. Research on Aberrancy Angle Probability Distribution for Ship Collision with Bridge Piers[J]. Structural Engineers, 2007, 23(1):31-37. (in Chinese)
[8] GENG Bo, WANG Hong, WANG Jun-jie. Probabilistic Model of Influence Parameters for Vessel-bridge Collisions in Three-Gorges Reservoir[J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science Edition, 2008, 36(4):111-115. (in Chinese)
[9] JCSS-OSTL/DIA/VROU-10-11-2000. Probabilistic Model Code[S].
[10] BUCHER C G. A Fast and Efficient Response Surface Approach for Structural Reliability Problems[J]. Structural Safety, 1990, 7(1):57-66.
[11] ZHANG Zhe, LI Sheng-yong, SHI Lei, et al. An Improved Response Surface Method for Structural Reliability Analysis and Its Application[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 24(8):111-115. (in Chinese)
[12] ALLAIX D L,CARBONE V I. An Improvement of the Response Surface Method[J]. Structural Safety, 2011, 33(2):165-172. (in Chinese)
[13] WU Qing-xi, ZHUO Jia-shou. A Sequential Response Surface Method with Various f and Its Application to Structural Reliability Analysis[J]. Journal of Hehai University, 2001, 29(2):75-78.(in Chinese)
[14] XU Teng-fei, ZHAO Ren-da, XIANG Tian-yu, et al. Reliability Analysis of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Concrete-filled Tube High Piers[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2010, 32(2):60-63. (in Chinese)
[15] WU Qing-xi. Structural Reliability Analysis and Stochastic Finite Element Method-Theory:Method. Engineering Application and Procedure Design[M]. Beijing:China Machine Press, 2005. (in Chinese)
[16] HUANG Yan-sheng, SONG Huan-yi, CAI Jian. Reliability Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Members Strengthening by Augmented Section under Eccentric Compression[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(8):146-151. (in Chinese)
[17] LI Yang-hai, BAO Wei-gang, GUO Xiu-wu, et al. The Reliability and Probability Limit State Design of Highway Bridge Structure[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press, 1997. (in Chinese)
[18] MANSOUR A E, WIRSCHING P H. Sensitivity Factors and Their Application to Marine Structures[J]. Marine Structures,1995, 8(3):229-255.
[19] LÜ Zhen-zhou, SONG Shu-fang, LI Hong-shuang. Analysis of Structure and Mechanism Reliability and Reliability Sensitivity[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
[1]
常柱刚, 王林凯, 夏飞龙. 基于CV NewMark-b法桥梁风致振动FSI数值模拟[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 13(2): 28-37.